The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus ScienceI couldn't make up my mind as to what to put in the Gullible's Travels
gallery today. Did I want to do the psychic dog? Or maybe
MoonFakers? There are just so many wacky things to choose from.
If you are wondering why this is important to me...it's because I see an enormous amount of zeal flowing into things that aren't real. We have big problems. Big problems that are real. If we could channel the energy we spend on the things that aren't real into the things that are...I just wonder if maybe we could actually do something about things like global warming, wars, food safety, the environment, the rise of fundamentalist extremism, the awful political situation the US is in....ad nauseum. These are taken from Robert L. Park's excellent article, The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science, that appeared in the January 31st 2003 issue of The Chronical of Higher Education. I encourage you to read the article in its entirety. While most of the skeptical articles I refer to deal with science...the principles hold true for politics, commerce and day to day living. You will readily recognize many of these warning signs from advertising. 1. The discoverer pitches the claim directly to the media. "An attempt to bypass peer review by taking a new result directly to the media, and thence to the public, suggests that the work is unlikely to stand up to close examination by other scientists." 2. The discoverer says that a powerful establishment is trying to suppress his or her work. "The idea is that the establishment will presumably stop at nothing to suppress discoveries that might shift the balance of wealth and power in society. Often, the discoverer describes mainstream science as part of a larger conspiracy that includes industry and government." 3. The scientific effect involved is always at the very limit of detection. "All scientific measurements must contend with some level of background noise or statistical fluctuation. But if the signal-to-noise ratio cannot be improved, even in principle, the effect is probably not real and the work is not science." 4. Evidence for a discovery is anecdotal. "If modern science has learned anything in the past century, it is to distrust anecdotal evidence. Because anecdotes have a very strong emotional impact, they serve to keep superstitious beliefs alive in an age of science." 5. The discoverer says a belief is credible because it has endured for centuries. " Ancient folk wisdom, rediscovered or repackaged, is unlikely to match the output of modern scientific laboratories." 6. The discoverer has worked in isolation. "Scientific breakthroughs nowadays are almost always syntheses of the work of many scientists." 7. The discoverer must propose new laws of nature to explain an observation. "A new law of nature, invoked to explain some extraordinary result, must not conflict with what is already known. If we must change existing laws of nature or propose new laws to account for an observation, it is almost certainly wrong." Also check out Robert L. Parks book, Voodoo Science: The Road From Foolishness to Fraud.
|
ARCHIVE
MY FRIENDS
bkfrogma
happytexas shaunna yoenlaplaya mahayani Scarlet Lark bukka elitzeh potgirl mushi fjlighthouse bbnewell FOLLOWERS ALL FRIENDS Rosiewolf's Journal Widgets: RSS | ATOM | JavaScript |



They have a somewhat fancy apparatus to split the DHMO molecule ;-) , and then supply the mixture under some pressure to a standard car engine to burn as fuel.
Now the actually provide plans the the whole thing.
(of course you should swap out you valves with stainless steeel and coat the cylinders with ceramic to prevent rust (yeah, right, I can do that at home).
They don't show one that works. Hmmmm.
But I don't think it could work, (beyond the time it takes to wear the battery down), since it takes X amount of energy to break the molecular bond, and you should only get that much back when you burn them to recreate water vapor as a compustion product. Not to mention the heat loss and other inefficiencies of the engine, which will need to produce enough power to run the engine, propell the car, and produce enough energy (via a generator) to split more water.
This definately f
Like they say when something sounds too good to be true, it is.
Oh, yeah. I've herd this guy Hoagland on Art Bell. He's pretty far out there. SHould be some fun reading there. Looks like he found out about the life on Mars that the governemnt won't reveal yet.....
Thanks for http://www.enterprisemission.com/. I'll check it further. Why do I just KNOW this guy speaks Klingon?
That's a really good idea, Old Jack. I do the same thing...not that all foriegn medical graduates are bad...I just want to see something following that degree that says the doc is good. I'm much more likely to see a FMG if he or she did a tour at Sloan-Kettering, JHU or the Mayo.